Breyanzi®: Real-world evidence in ~400 R/R LBCL patients from CIBMTR* registry1
*This analysis does not reflect the opinion of CIBMTR or its funding sources.
CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research.
Important information1,2
- A noninterventional, observational study of 396 US patients enrolled in the CIBMTR Cellular Therapy Registry between February 2021 and November 2022 after infusion with Breyanzi for R/R LBCL across 58 treatment sites
- Primary objective was to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of Breyanzi, including ORR, CR, DOR, PFS, safety, and OS
Select demographics (N=396)1
Median age: 70
(range: 23-91)
ECOG PS 0-1: 84%
ECOG PS ≥2: 7%
3 median prior therapies
(range: 1-12)
Real-world study limitations1
- Limitations of this study include its retrospective and observational design, limited follow-up, and heterogeneity in institutional standards for toxicity management across different centers
- Response assessment was per investigator discretion, and there was no Independent Review Committee
- Results were analyzed and reported descriptively; no formal hypothesis testing was performed; analyses are not intended to be compared to controlled clinical trial data. Causality cannot be established based on real-world data. Therefore, outcomes should be interpreted with caution
CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; LBCL, large B-cell lymphoma; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; R/R, relapsed or refractory.
Response rates with Breyanzi in the real-world setting
Consistent efficacy and safety results with Breyanzi across clinical trial and real-world settings1,3
Response rates (N=388)1†
Median follow-up of 11 months1
Duration of response (N=288)
Median DOR: NR (95% CI: NR, NR)
12-month DOR: 62% (95% CI: 53, 69)‡
Overall survival (N=396)
Median OS: NR (95% CI: NR, NR)‡
12-month OS: 66% (95% CI: 60, 71)‡
Real-world study limitations1
- Limitations of this study include its retrospective and observational design, limited follow-up, and heterogeneity in institutional standards for toxicity management across different centers
- Response assessment was per investigator discretion, and there was no Independent Review Committee
- Results were analyzed and reported descriptively; no formal hypothesis testing was performed; analyses are not intended to be compared to controlled clinical trial data. Causality cannot be established based on real-world data. Therefore, outcomes should be interpreted with caution
†Eligible for response assessment.
‡Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; LBCL, large B-cell lymphoma; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; R/R, relapsed or refractory.
Consistent safety profile observed in the real-world setting (N=396)1
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS)†
Real-world study limitations1
- Limitations of this study include its retrospective and observational design, limited follow-up, and heterogeneity in institutional standards for toxicity management across different centers
- Response assessment was per investigator discretion, and there was no Independent Review Committee
- Results were analyzed and reported descriptively; no formal hypothesis testing was performed; analyses are not intended to be compared to controlled clinical trial data. Causality cannot be established based on real-world data. Therefore, outcomes should be interpreted with caution
Grade 5 CRS or ICANS were observed in 3 and 3 patients, respectively, and all but 2 patients had concomitant causes of death, including disease progression (n=3) and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n=2). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and/or persistent neutropenia at 30 days post infusion was observed in 10% of patients.2
†American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria were utilized for assessment of CRS and neurotoxicity in the real-world setting, while Lee et al, 2014 criteria for grading CRS and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) for grading neurologic toxicities were utilized in TRANSCEND LBCL trial. There was a high concordance on the CRS grading per Lee and ASTCT criteria.1,3
ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; LBCL, large B-cell lymphoma; R/R, relapsed or refractory.
References
- Crombie JL, Nastoupil LJ, Andreadis C, et al. Multicenter, real-world study in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell (LBCL) lymphoma who received lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in the US. Presented at: American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 9, 2023; San Diego, CA. Presentation 104.
- Crombie JL, Nastoupil LJ, Andreadis C, et al. Multicenter, real-world study in patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in the United States (US). Presented at: American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition; December 9, 2023; San Diego, CA. Abstract 104.
- Breyanzi [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.